TW/HaG Constellation in game (Fixed Glows)

Discussions of various Star Trek ships and mods for Cataclysm

Moderators: TheStressPuppy, Dolphoenix, Charvell, Pierce 2: The Sequel

TheStressPuppy
Posts: 2869
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2000 1:00 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Post by TheStressPuppy » Mon Feb 16, 2004 1:33 pm

Topic says it all ;) look for her in TW 0.2.2
EDIT: Fixed the glows to canon appearence

Here are some nice battle shots angainst a cardie fleet (needless to say the wing of connies were lost)
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

[ 17. February 2004, 01:39 AM: Message edited by: TheStressPuppy ]
How can you alter one side of a bargain? baltar
When there is no "other" side...You missed the whole point of the war. The Imperious Leader

User avatar
Meurig
Posts: 7746
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2000 1:00 pm
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Post by Meurig » Mon Feb 16, 2004 1:46 pm

Cataclysm always had far nicer lighting that HW, and it shows it very nicely here.

For a butt-ugly ship that looks pretty damned nice [img]smile.gif[/img]

[ 16. February 2004, 12:47 PM: Message edited by: Meurig47 ]

Captain Pierce
Posts: 5944
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2001 1:00 pm
Location: I\'m from Iowa--I only work in outer space
Contact:

Post by Captain Pierce » Mon Feb 16, 2004 1:47 pm

Hey, Stress, watched "The Battle" yesterday after you left, and it turns out the Stargazer has warp glows on both sides of the nacelles--you can just barely see it when she powers up to fight the Enterprise. Since Picard abandoned the Stargazer in 2355, about the time of this mod, I think the TW Constellation should have the full warp-glow package...

Looks freaking amazing in-game. :D

TheStressPuppy
Posts: 2869
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2000 1:00 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Post by TheStressPuppy » Mon Feb 16, 2004 1:49 pm

ARGH! now you tell me! [img]tongue.gif[/img] ok glows it is :D I also tend to agree that this isnt the "best" design trek has to offer, but its a canon part of trek so in the mods it goes :D

[ 16. February 2004, 12:52 PM: Message edited by: TheStressPuppy ]

Skeeter
Posts: 2330
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2001 12:00 am
Location: In my room :)
Contact:

Post by Skeeter » Mon Feb 16, 2004 2:02 pm

Nice.

Looks like the 1st pic is in a atmosphere of sorts which looks kinda cool. [img]smile.gif[/img]

Captain Pierce
Posts: 5944
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2001 1:00 pm
Location: I\'m from Iowa--I only work in outer space
Contact:

Post by Captain Pierce » Mon Feb 16, 2004 2:04 pm

Well, I was GONNA go look at it while you were online yesterday morning, but YOU told me not to... [img]tongue.gif[/img]

TheStressPuppy
Posts: 2869
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2000 1:00 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Post by TheStressPuppy » Mon Feb 16, 2004 2:09 pm

I gotta SLEEP sometime [img]tongue.gif[/img] get yer @ss on MSN

Sjet vs. Kerrigan
Posts: 2745
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2000 1:00 pm
Location: Portland, OR, USA
Contact:

Post by Sjet vs. Kerrigan » Tue Feb 17, 2004 12:08 am

That ship is far too pretty. I remember the Stargazer looking like a piece of junk, but one could be proud of serving on this vessel. It's all wrong!

TheStressPuppy
Posts: 2869
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2000 1:00 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Post by TheStressPuppy » Tue Feb 17, 2004 12:38 am

All the constellations looked like crap in TNG cause they used the same model for all the ep's....shot up and all! :eek: Im just wondering if the bridge broke off after "the battle" and they just made a quick replacement for "peak preformance. Basicly they never bothered to clean it up between episodes

[ 16. February 2004, 11:42 PM: Message edited by: TheStressPuppy ]

Captain Pierce
Posts: 5944
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2001 1:00 pm
Location: I\'m from Iowa--I only work in outer space
Contact:

Post by Captain Pierce » Tue Feb 17, 2004 12:52 am

Well, there was only like one time that the thing wasn't supposed to have been shot up... ;)

Post Reply

Return to “Cataclysm Trek”